Skip to main content

Coolie No. 1(2020)- Review

Coolie No. 1(2020)- Review



Coolie No. 1 (2020) is a comedy film, remake of the 1995 film Coolie No. 1 starring Govinda and Karisma Kapoor in the lead roles. It starts with Jeffery Rozario (Paresh Rawal) who wishes to marry his daughter, his only criteria is choosing a boy who is extremely wealthy. Soon he gets acquainted with Kunwar Raj Pratap Singh (Varun Dhawan), who is a billionaire, has a slew of cars, and dines with famous cricketers & film stars and has phone calls with Trump & Modi. Sounds way too good to be true right? That is because it isn’t remotely true. Kunwar Raj Pratap Singh is in reality Raju a coolie. In order to get married to Jeffery’s daughter Sarah (Sara Ali Khan), Raju is portraying the persona of being ultra-rich, after he is convinced by pundit Jai Kishan (Javed Jaffrey) to do so if he wishes to marry Sarah. Jai Kishan has an ulterior motive of bringing the pride of Jeffery, after he was balefully insulted by him. Raju, in trying to keep up the ruse of being rich gets tied down in his own spiral of lies, which creates supposedly funny situations.
The story is what one would expect, not logical but giving out hilarious content. At the core of it, it mimics the original film with a few variations applying modern touches to it. Varun Dhawan puts good effort in his portrayal of Raju, but it seems too much effort as at times it feels like he is over acting. Due to Dhawan’s similar acting style across most of his movies, the character of Raju & its portrayal seem very much like the main character played by Dhawan in ‘Main Tera Hero (2014)’. Raju’s recurring mimicry of famous actors & dialogues can get annoying after a point of time. The film surely tries to cast actors famed because of their comical prowess namely Paresh Rawal, Javed Jaffrey, Rajpal Yadav & Johnny Lever, but even with these, the film does not meet the expectations of the viewers. Particularly Jaffery’s portrayal of Jai Kishan & him being casted in that role can be questioned.
From time to time Bollywood has proved movies can be funnier even with its absurd & illogical story line, but this movie’s story is not even remotely backed by a funny movie to the level one would expect. The fight scenes seem redundant and unnecessary with the story line. The soundtrack has a good set of artists creating it with fairly good songs, but the songs seem forced in the context of the movie and try to stretch the movie for no apparent reason. The movie does not even give time to build up to the story or get familiar with the characters, rather delves directly in it within a few scenes.
Overall the movie isn’t extraordinary or indulging. No one would see anything different from similar types of existing movies. You will not miss out on much or actually anything if choose not to watch the film. The movie is at most worthy of your sparest of spare times, surely not one for which you should be making time for.


Acting- 6
Casting- 6.5
Cinematography- 8
Dialogue- 6
Directing- 7.5
Editing & Effects- 6
Sound & Music- 7.5
Story- 4
Storytelling- 4
Rating- 5.5


Available on: Amazon Prime


Also Read On: MediumVocalSubstack

Comments

Popular Posts

Two and a Half Men(2003–2015)- Review

  Two and a Half Man is an American sitcom mainly about a Charlie Harper (Charlie Sheen) his brother Alan Harper (Jon Cryer) and his nephew Jake Harper (August T. Jones). Charlie a jingle writer with a playboy lifestyle and a care free attitude had never been one to be close to his family or the type of person to make one. The sitcom begins with Alan looking for a place to stay with his son, when his wife Judith (Marin Hinkle) decides to divorce him. With this he turns to his elder brother for a temporary place to crash. Charlie lets Alan and Jake stay at his Malibu beach house, after Alan pleads that it is going to be temporary. This simple story produces hilarious scenes with Charlie hoping to continue his lifestyle but being hindered by Alan who seems to have made his stay permeant and his 8 years old nephew always around. The story even at its basic level feels like an amazing plot for a sitcom which is made even better by Chuck Lorre. Chuck makes sure to keep the show humorous thr

Madam Chief Minister(2021)- Review

Madam Chief Minister(2021)- Review Madam Chief Minister is a Hindi language political drama taking us through the journey of Tara Roopram (Richa Chadda). Tara comes from a small village born to a family that comes on the lower side of the societal pyramid. Discriminated all her life and at the lowest point of her life, Tara comes to get acquainted with Master Surajbhan (Saurabh Shukla). The Master is a leader of a political party who has been campaigning all his life for the people who have always been neglected by the society. After coming under the wing of Surajbhan, Tara learns the tricks of the trade and how to survive in the political spectrum drenched in corruption, greed, and hegemony. In a short time, Tara proves her worth and ability to succeed as a political leader, be it still considered a novice by everyone. With time she earns the seat of becoming the Chief Minister; with the help of a few friends and not to mention more than a few enemies. The movie then continues wit

12 Angry Men(1957)- Review

12 Angry Men(1957)- Review 12 Angry Men is a courtroom drama displaying deliberations, as its name suggests, by 12 men who are part of a jury and have to make a consensual decision about an 18 year old boy who has allegedly stabbed his father to death and faces a death penalty. The boy does not come from a glorious background and with his violent past everyone quickly forms a judgment of him. Initially seeming an open & shut case with all evidence pointing fingers to the boy, all jurors unhesitatingly vote guilty in a preliminary vote apart from one, Juror 8 (Henry Fonda). While he too doesn’t have very high regards for the boy, but believes the evidence collected can be questioned when thoroughly studied. With this he feels there is a reasonable doubt to the boy’s involvement to the horrendous act. Other jurors already having made a conclusion in their mind initially get agitated by Juror 8 who is taking an opposite position to the general public & all the jurors. Without