Skip to main content

Madam Chief Minister(2021)- Review

Madam Chief Minister(2021)- Review


Madam Chief Minister is a Hindi language political drama taking us through the journey of Tara Roopram (Richa Chadda). Tara comes from a small village born to a family that comes on the lower side of the societal pyramid. Discriminated all her life and at the lowest point of her life, Tara comes to get acquainted with Master Surajbhan (Saurabh Shukla). The Master is a leader of a political party who has been campaigning all his life for the people who have always been neglected by the society. After coming under the wing of Surajbhan, Tara learns the tricks of the trade and how to survive in the political spectrum drenched in corruption, greed, and hegemony. In a short time, Tara proves her worth and ability to succeed as a political leader, be it still considered a novice by everyone. With time she earns the seat of becoming the Chief Minister; with the help of a few friends and not to mention more than a few enemies. The movie then continues with the political tale of treachery and greed that consumes Madam Chief Minister’s administration.

The basic premise should be said is fantastic and promising a great story in the making. The casting of all characters is inch-perfect and done fantastically leaving no room for complaint. The location setting and cinematography are fairly accurate matching one’s expectations. Finally, Chadda is exceptional in portraying the fierce leader that Tara goes on to be, and Shukla equally matches her class portraying the role of her teacher/guru.

But unfortunately, the actors’ efforts go to vain due to pretty much all other aspects of the film. As I mentioned earlier the premise had great potential but it still required a good script which the movie terribly fails to deliver. The story of Tara’s rise is quite unusual and honestly not at all believable. The story could have been so much better showcasing a slow and steady rise, than the clumsy and quick accession Tara achieves. One thing must be said the film surely is not short of delivering surprises with one twist after another following. But by the end, they are way too much adding to the misery of the movie. Lastly, the movie was way too stretched for no apparent reason or a story.

All in all, Madam Chief Minister is a terrible attempt at creating an Indian political drama lead by a female actor. I would not recommend the movie to anyone. But, if you like nonsensical Indian political movies or are a big fan of Richa Chadda give it a try; can’t say if you too won’t be disappointed.

Acting- 8.5

Casting- 9

Cinematography- 7

Dialogue- 5

Directing- 6.5

Editing & Effects- 6

Sound & Music- 4.5

Story- 5.5

Storytelling- 3.5

Rating- 4.5


Available on: Netflix


Also Read On: Medium — Vocal — Substack

Comments

Popular Posts

Two and a Half Men(2003–2015)- Review

  Two and a Half Man is an American sitcom mainly about a Charlie Harper (Charlie Sheen) his brother Alan Harper (Jon Cryer) and his nephew Jake Harper (August T. Jones). Charlie a jingle writer with a playboy lifestyle and a care free attitude had never been one to be close to his family or the type of person to make one. The sitcom begins with Alan looking for a place to stay with his son, when his wife Judith (Marin Hinkle) decides to divorce him. With this he turns to his elder brother for a temporary place to crash. Charlie lets Alan and Jake stay at his Malibu beach house, after Alan pleads that it is going to be temporary. This simple story produces hilarious scenes with Charlie hoping to continue his lifestyle but being hindered by Alan who seems to have made his stay permeant and his 8 years old nephew always around. The story even at its basic level feels like an amazing plot for a sitcom which is made even better by Chuck Lorre. Chuck makes sure to keep the show humorous thr

12 Angry Men(1957)- Review

12 Angry Men(1957)- Review 12 Angry Men is a courtroom drama displaying deliberations, as its name suggests, by 12 men who are part of a jury and have to make a consensual decision about an 18 year old boy who has allegedly stabbed his father to death and faces a death penalty. The boy does not come from a glorious background and with his violent past everyone quickly forms a judgment of him. Initially seeming an open & shut case with all evidence pointing fingers to the boy, all jurors unhesitatingly vote guilty in a preliminary vote apart from one, Juror 8 (Henry Fonda). While he too doesn’t have very high regards for the boy, but believes the evidence collected can be questioned when thoroughly studied. With this he feels there is a reasonable doubt to the boy’s involvement to the horrendous act. Other jurors already having made a conclusion in their mind initially get agitated by Juror 8 who is taking an opposite position to the general public & all the jurors. Without